Fully allocated QA team
Long-term product knowledge grows
Best for ongoing delivery

KPS provides quality assurance services throughout the whole SDLC process to reduce release risk, improve software reliability, and maintain stable product quality as delivery becomes more complex. Our teams help find, eliminate, and prevent potential defects before release, improve test coverage for critical workflows, and build QA processes that support clear, consistent release decisions.

Benefits
As release activity increases alongside product development, quality issues begin to affect planning, team coordination, and post-release workload. A strong QA setup helps reduce production issues, lower the cost of avoidable fixes, use specialist time more efficiently, and keep testing practices consistent as products and teams grow.
Reduces the number of defects in production
Improves confidence before release
Keeps delivery more predictable over time
Reveals issues earlier in the delivery cycle
Makes recurring quality problems easier to track
Reduces the effort needed for late fixes
Strengthens validation of critical workflows
Expands coverage for new features and changes
Reduces gaps in important testing areas
Makes release decisions clearer for teams
Reduces uncertainty before deployment
Keeps testing aligned with delivery priorities
Establishes clearer testing routines across releases
Reduces reliance on ad hoc checks
Keeps quality practices more consistent as teams grow
Improves the stability of daily product use
Reduces disruption caused by avoidable issues
Protects important user flows during change
Considering software quality assurance services for your product?
KPS helps define the right QA approach and set clear QA practices, so teams can validate changes consistently without extra coordination at every step.
Our Services
Our quality assurance services cover different stages of product delivery, depending on how releases are planned, how testing is currently organized, and where quality risks appear most often. Test documentation, testing scripts, and core QA practices are also recorded in a structured way, so the team can keep using them later with internal resources or another vendor.
Used to check features, user flows, and system behavior in a structured way. It is especially important in areas where detailed human review is needed to confirm expected results and detect defects that automated checks may miss.
Checks whether new changes have affected existing functionality. It is important for products with frequent releases, shared components, or critical workflows that need to stay stable across updates.
Created for repeatable scenarios, critical user journeys, and release validation. This approach strengthens test automation and makes quality control more consistent as delivery speed increases.
Shows how validation is planned, executed, and documented across the delivery cycle. It helps identify weak points, unclear responsibilities, and gaps that make releases harder to control.
Confirm that new functionality, fixes, and integrations are ready for deployment. This gives teams a clearer basis for release decisions and supports more reliable QA testing before launch.
Prepared to make validation more structured and repeatable. Clear documentation also helps teams keep testing consistent across releases and reduces reliance on informal knowledge.
Checks how different system parts work together after changes are introduced. It helps detect issues in data exchange, service interaction, and connected workflows before they affect production use.
Used after builds or deployments to confirm that the main functions work at a basic level. It gives teams a quick way to detect major issues early and supports a more stable software development lifecycle.

Technology Stack
The set of quality assurance tools must be appropriate for the product, the scope of testing, and the environments in which testing is conducted. KPS works with testing frameworks, automation tools, and related platforms that are suitable for various release models, system types, and quality control requirements.
Model providers: OpenAI, Anthropic Automation frameworks: Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, WebdriverIO
Automated UI testing: Playwright, Cypress, Selenium
Mobile automation: Appium
API testing tools: Postman, Swagger, SoapUI, Insomnia, REST Assured
Service validation: REST APIs, GraphQL APIs, microservice communication
Data exchange checks: request validation, response validation, schema checks
Performance testing tools: JMeter, k6, Gatling, LoadRunner, Locust
Load testing scenarios: concurrent users, traffic spikes, response time checks
System behavior checks: throughput, latency, stability under load
Test management platforms: TestRail, Zephyr, Xray, Qase, TestLink
Documentation tools: Confluence, Notion, Jira
Testing assets: test cases, checklists, bug reports, validation notes
CI/CD tools: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, CircleCI
Release validation support: build checks, smoke tests, regression runs
Deployment workflows: continuous integration, release pipelines, test execution in staging
Cross-browser testing tools: BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, LambdaTest
Device coverage: desktop browsers, tablets, mobile devices, real device labs
Compatibility testing areas: browser behavior, screen sizes, operating systems
Security testing tools: OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, Snyk, SonarQube
Validation areas: vulnerability checks, insecure dependencies, common web security risks
Compliance support: GDPR-aware testing, access control checks, data handling review
Accessibility testing tools: axe, Lighthouse, Wave, NVDA, VoiceOver
Cloud and environment support: AWS, Google Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure
Environment technologies: Docker, Kubernetes, test environments, staging environments
Engagement Models
Engagement models for software QA consulting services
QA support can be structured in different ways depending on release frequency, testing scope, and the level of ownership your team wants to keep. KPS offers flexible work formats that fit both ongoing product delivery and clearly defined testing needs.
Our Process
QA work requires a clear workflow, well-defined responsibilities, and consistent verification steps throughout the SDLC. Our process is built around 6 practical steps that help teams understand exactly what will be tested, how quality risks will be addressed, and how testing aligns with release decisions.
STEP 01:
Product stakeholders, delivery managers, and QA leads review the release scope, critical workflows, recent changes, known risk areas, and product goals related to user experience. This step sets testing priorities, highlights the areas with the highest delivery impact, and gives the team a clearer basis for planning validation.
STEP 02:
QA leads and QA engineers define the testing scope, coverage, acceptance criteria, and validation approach for the release. The roadmap covers functional checks, regression priorities, environment needs, and the activities required to support reliable release decisions.
STEP 03:
QA engineers prepare test cases, checklists, test data, and the environments required for execution. When automated checks are included in the testing scope, automation engineers update existing scripts or prepare new ones for repeatable validation.
STEP 04:
The QA team runs planned checks across critical user flows, changed functionality, integrations, and risk areas. Findings are documented with clear reproduction steps, expected behavior, actual behavior, and release impact so developers can address issues without delay.
STEP 05:
QA engineers, developers, and delivery leads review detected issues based on severity, business impact, and release timing. After fixes are applied, the QA team rechecks affected areas and summarizes open risks, blocked items, and remaining concerns that may affect release quality.
STEP 06:
After deployment, QA specialists verify critical production flows and review whether release-related issues appeared in live use. The results are used to confirm stability, document missed gaps, and adjust future testing priorities where needed.
STEP 01:
Product stakeholders, delivery managers, and QA leads review the release scope, critical workflows, recent changes, known risk areas, and product goals related to user experience. This step sets testing priorities, highlights the areas with the highest delivery impact, and gives the team a clearer basis for planning validation.
STEP 02:
QA leads and QA engineers define the testing scope, coverage, acceptance criteria, and validation approach for the release. The roadmap covers functional checks, regression priorities, environment needs, and the activities required to support reliable release decisions.
STEP 03:
QA engineers prepare test cases, checklists, test data, and the environments required for execution. When automated checks are included in the testing scope, automation engineers update existing scripts or prepare new ones for repeatable validation.
STEP 04:
The QA team runs planned checks across critical user flows, changed functionality, integrations, and risk areas. Findings are documented with clear reproduction steps, expected behavior, actual behavior, and release impact so developers can address issues without delay.
STEP 05:
QA engineers, developers, and delivery leads review detected issues based on severity, business impact, and release timing. After fixes are applied, the QA team rechecks affected areas and summarizes open risks, blocked items, and remaining concerns that may affect release quality.
STEP 06:
After deployment, QA specialists verify critical production flows and review whether release-related issues appeared in live use. The results are used to confirm stability, document missed gaps, and adjust future testing priorities where needed.
Clients' feedback
What matters most is how QA affects the release process once it is in place. The feedback of our clients reflects the impact on defect rates, release predictability, and team coordination across delivery cycles.

Naomi Rubinstein
Founder at BettercareThey are the best team we have ever worked with. The application increased the speed of receiving data by 4 times. Data loss was reduced by 10%. Ineffective tasks decreased by 7%. Response rate to customer requests increased by 23%. Our customers have seen significant increases in efficiency.

Aleksandr Podolyan
Technical Specialist & Product Manager., RDO UkraineKultprosvet has executed deliverables perfectly and provided us with a high-quality application. They’ve fulfilled our requirements, and the product perfectly fits our needs. The team’s development efforts have helped our business immensely.

Oleksandr Zainchukivskyi
Head of Technology, AMACOWe've had a very good experience with them. We trust them, and we'll continue to work with them. If we ever need something done, they always deliver.

Luc Lecorre
Luc Lecorre, Co-Investor, Luxury Handbag CompanyKultprosvet was highly knowledgeable, and they made us aware of some issues we hadn’t considered. They explained everything very clearly and helped us understand the broader scope of the work.

Yulia Goldenberg
PhD Researcher, Ben Gurion University of the NegevThe work is always delivered on time, and they are very fair about the pricing. Kultprosvet is transparent, and we know that we can trust them; we are never surprised by anything that comes up.

Cameron Tope
Founder, Rooya (Polysurance)OUR TEAM
Contact our client support team, which will provide you with a technical evaluation of your needs and give you details on the collaboration resources you will need.
HELP
You might find the answers here:
Since working with Kultprosvet, our customers are much happier with the product and its UX. They’ve added flexibility where the system was previously rigid, and they take full responsibility for the project, quickly fixing any issues that arise.